Mostrar registro simples

dc.contributor.authorBerk, Michaelpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorDean, Olivia M.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorCotton, Sue M.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorGama, Clarissa Severinopt_BR
dc.contributor.authorKapczinski, Flávio Pereirapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorFernandes, Brisa Simõespt_BR
dc.contributor.authorKohlmann, Kristypt_BR
dc.contributor.authorJeavons, Susanpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorHewitt, Karenpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorMoss, Kirsteenpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorAllwang, Christinept_BR
dc.contributor.authorSchapkaitz, Ianpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorCobb, Heidipt_BR
dc.contributor.authorBush, Ashley I.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorDodd, Seetalpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorMalhi, Gin S.pt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2015-03-07T01:57:05Zpt_BR
dc.date.issued2012pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn1741-7015pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10183/111819pt_BR
dc.description.abstractBackground: N-acetyl cysteine (NAC) is a glutathione precursor that has been shown to have antidepressant efficacy in a placebo-controlled trial. The current study aimed to investigate the maintenance effects of NAC following eight weeks of open-label treatment for bipolar disorder. Method: The efficacy of a double blind randomized placebo controlled trial of 2 g/day NAC as adjunct maintenance treatment for bipolar disorder was examined. Participants (n = 149) had a Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Score of ≥12 at trial entry and, after eight weeks of open-label NAC treatment, were randomized to adjunctive NAC or placebo, in addition to treatment as usual. Participants (primarily outpatients) were recruited through public and private services and through newspaper advertisements. Time to intervention for a mood episode was the primary endpoint of the study, and changes in mood symptoms, functionality and quality of life measures were secondary outcomes. Results: There was a substantial decrease in symptoms during the eight-week open-label NAC treatment phase. During the subsequent double-blind phase, there was minimal further change in outcome measures with scores remaining low. Consequently, from this low plateau, between-group differences did not emerge on recurrence, clinical functioning or quality of life measures. Conclusions: There were no significant between-group differences in recurrence or symptomatic outcomes during the maintenance phase of the trial; however, these findings may be confounded by limitations. Trial Registration: The trial was registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12607000074493).en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofBMC medicine. Londres. Vol. 10 (Aug. 2012), 11p.pt_BR
dc.rightsOpen Accessen
dc.subjectDepressãopt_BR
dc.subjectN-acetyl cysteineen
dc.subjectDepressionen
dc.subjectTranstorno bipolarpt_BR
dc.subjectManutençãopt_BR
dc.subjectBipolar disorderen
dc.subjectEstresse oxidativopt_BR
dc.subjectMaintenanceen
dc.subjectManiaen
dc.subjectOxidativeen
dc.titleMaintenance N-acetyl cysteine treatment for bipolar disorder : a double-blind randomized placebo controlled trialpt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de periódicopt_BR
dc.identifier.nrb000953105pt_BR
dc.type.originEstrangeiropt_BR


Thumbnail
   

Este item está licenciado na Creative Commons License

Mostrar registro simples