Mostrar registro simples

dc.contributor.authorSchmid, Karen Barrospt_BR
dc.contributor.authorScherer, Luciene Cardosopt_BR
dc.contributor.authorBarcellos, Regina Bonespt_BR
dc.contributor.authorKühleis, Daniele Chavespt_BR
dc.contributor.authorPrestes, Isaías Valentept_BR
dc.contributor.authorSteffen, Ricardo Ewbankpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorCosta, Elis Regina Dallapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorRossetti, Maria Lucia Rosapt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2015-04-09T01:57:56Zpt_BR
dc.date.issued2014pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn1471-2334pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10183/115071pt_BR
dc.description.abstractBackground: Prison conditions can favor the spread of tuberculosis (TB). This study aimed to evaluate in a Brazilian prison: the performance and accuracy of smear, culture and Detect-TB; performance of smear plus culture and smear plus Detect-TB, according to different TB prevalence rates; and the cost-effectiveness of these procedures for pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) diagnosis. Methods: This paper describes a cost-effectiveness study. A decision analytic model was developed to estimate the costs and cost-effectiveness of five routine diagnostic procedures for diagnosis of PTB using sputum specimens: a) Smear alone, b) Culture alone, c) Detect-TB alone, d) Smear plus culture and e) Smear plus Detect-TB. The cost-effectiveness ratio of costs were evaluated per correctly diagnosed TB case and all procedures costs were attributed based on the procedure costs adopted by the Brazilian Public Health System. Results: A total of 294 spontaneous sputum specimens from patients suspected of having TB were analyzed. The sensibility and specificity were calculated to be 47% and 100% for smear; 93% and 100%, for culture; 74% and 95%, for Detect-TB; 96% and 100%, for smear plus culture; and 86% and 95%, for smear plus Detect-TB. The negative and positive predictive values for smear plus Detect-TB, according to different TB prevalence rates, ranged from 83 to 99% and 48 to 96%, respectively. In a cost-effectiveness analysis, smear was both less costly and less effective than the other strategies. Culture and smear plus culture were more effective but more costly than the other strategies. Smear plus Detect-TB was the most cost-effective method. Conclusions: The Detect-TB evinced to be sensitive and effective for the PTB diagnosis when applied with smear microscopy. Diagnostic methods should be improved to increase TB case detection. To support rational decisions about the implementation of such techniques, cost-effectiveness studies are essential, including in prisons, which are known for health care assessment problems.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofBMC infectious diseases. London. Vol. 14, no. 1, (Dec. 2014), p. 1-10pt_BR
dc.rightsOpen Accessen
dc.subjectTuberculose pulmonarpt_BR
dc.subjectTuberculosisen
dc.subjectCost-effectivenessen
dc.subjectPresidiáriospt_BR
dc.subjectPrisonen
dc.subjectDetect-TBen
dc.subjectMolecular diagnosisen
dc.subjectIS6110en
dc.titleSmear plus detect-TB for a sensitive diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis : a cost-effectiveness analysis in an incarcerated populationpt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de periódicopt_BR
dc.identifier.nrb000955832pt_BR
dc.type.originEstrangeiropt_BR


Thumbnail
   

Este item está licenciado na Creative Commons License

Mostrar registro simples