Mostrar registro simples

dc.contributor.authorPicon, Paulo Dornellespt_BR
dc.contributor.authorPribbernow, Suzane Cristina Milechpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorPrompt, Carlos Albertopt_BR
dc.contributor.authorSchacher, Suzana Comunellopt_BR
dc.contributor.authorAntunes, Verônica Verleine Hörbept_BR
dc.contributor.authorChiella, Bianca Paula Mentzpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorOliveira, Fabiane Lopespt_BR
dc.contributor.authorSouza, Célia Mariana Barbosa dept_BR
dc.contributor.authorSchacher, Fernando Comunellopt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2015-07-15T02:08:05Zpt_BR
dc.date.issued2014pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn1807-5932pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10183/119170pt_BR
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVES: Anemia is a common complication among chronic kidney disease patients on hemodialysis, occurring mostly due to erythropoietin deficiency. This randomized noninferiority trial sought to compare the efficacy and safety of a new epoetin formulation developed by Bio-Manguinhos, a biologics manufacturer affiliated with the Brazilian government, with those of a commercially available product currently used in Brazil (a biosimilar epoetin formulation). METHODS: The sample size needed to enable demonstration of noninferiority with a statistical power of 85% for a between-group difference in hemoglobin levels of no more than 1.5 g/dL was calculated. In total, 74 patients were randomly assigned to receive the epoetin formulation from Bio-Manguinhos (n = 36) or the biosimilar epoetin formulation (n = 38) in a double-blind fashion. The inclusion criteria were current epoetin therapy and stable hemoglobin levels for at least 3 months prior to the study. The primary and secondary outcomes were mean monthly hemoglobin levels and safety, respectively. The dose was calculated according to international criteria and adjusted monthly in both groups according to hemoglobin levels and at the assistant physicians’ discretion. Iron storage was estimated at baseline and once monthly. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01184495. RESULTS: The study was conducted for 6 months after randomization. The mean baseline hemoglobin levels were 10.9¡1.2 and 10.96¡1.2 g/dL (p = 0.89) in the Bio-Manguinhos epoetin and biosimilar epoetin groups, respectively. During the study period, there was no significant change in hemoglobin levels in either group (p = 0.055, ANOVA). The epoetin from Bio-Manguinhos was slightly superior in the last 3 months of follow-up. The adverse event profiles of the two formulations were also similar. CONCLUSIONS: The epoetin formulations tested in this study are equivalent in efficacy and safety.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfpt_BR
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofClinics. São Paulo. Vol. 69, n. 8 (Ago. 2014), p. 547-553pt_BR
dc.rightsOpen Accessen
dc.subjectEpoetin alfaen
dc.subjectEnsaio clínico controlado aleatóriopt_BR
dc.subjectInsuficiência renal crônicapt_BR
dc.subjectRandomized controlled trialen
dc.subjectChronic kidney diseaseen
dc.subjectAnemiapt_BR
dc.subjectDiálise renalpt_BR
dc.subjectAnemiaen
dc.subjectHemodialysisen
dc.subjectEritropoetinapt_BR
dc.subjectErythropoietinen
dc.titleRandomized double-blind clinical trial of a new human epoetin versus a commercially available formula for anemia control in patients on hemodialysispt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de periódicopt_BR
dc.identifier.nrb000953923pt_BR
dc.type.originNacionalpt_BR


Thumbnail
   

Este item está licenciado na Creative Commons License

Mostrar registro simples