Mostrar registro simples

dc.contributor.authorPortinho, Ciro Pazpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorSantos, Luis Alberto dospt_BR
dc.contributor.authorCerski, Carlos Thadeu Schmidtpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorRivero, Raquel Camarapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorCollares, Marcus Vinicius Martinspt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-13T02:15:54Zpt_BR
dc.date.issued2014pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn0102-8650pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10183/147197pt_BR
dc.description.abstractABSTRACTPURPOSE: To evaluate experimental cranial vault reconstructions, by combining bone morphogenetic protein type 2 (BMP-2) and different matrices.METHODS: Fourty-nine animals were initially included (seven per group). We designed an experimental, open, prospective and comparative study, divided in seven groups: 1 – BMP-2+calcium phosphate (BT); 2 – BMP-2+acellular dermal matrix (BM); 3 – BMP-2+calcium alginate (BA); 4 – TCP; 5 – MDM; 6 – ALG; 7 – Bone autograft (BAG). A bone failure was created in left parietal bone of adult male mice. At the same procedure reconstruction was performed. After five weeks, animals were sacrificed, and reconstruction area was removed to histological analysis. After exclusion due to death or infection, thirty-eight animals were evaluated (BT=5; BM=6; BA=6; TCP=7; MDM=3; ALG=6; BAG=5).RESULTS: A higher incidence of infection has occurred in MDM group (57%, P=0.037). In cortical fusion, groups BAG, TCP, and BMP-2+TCP (BT) obtained the best scores, comparing to the others (P=0.00846). In new bone formation, groups BT, BAG, and TCP have presented the best scores (P=0.00835). When neovascularization was considered, best groups were BMP-2+MDM (BM), BMP-2+ALG (BA), TCP, and MDM (P=0.001695). BAG group was the best in bone marrow formation, followed by groups BT and TCP (P=0.008317). CONCLUSIONS: Bone morphogenetic protein type 2 increased bone regeneration in experimental skull reconstruction, especially when combined to calcium phosphate. Such association was even comparable to bone autograft, the gold-standard treatment, in some histological criteria.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofActa cirúrgica brasileira. São Paulo, SP. Vol. 29, no. 10 (Oct. 2014), p. 622-632pt_BR
dc.rightsOpen Accessen
dc.subjectBone and bonesen
dc.subjectOsso e ossospt_BR
dc.subjectBone transplantationen
dc.subjectEngenharia de tecidospt_BR
dc.subjectTissue engineeringen
dc.subjectBone matrixen
dc.subjectCraniofacial abnormalitiesen
dc.subjectMiceen
dc.titleCranial vault reconstruction with bone morphogenetic protein, calcium phosphate, acellular dermal matrix, and calcium alginate in micept_BR
dc.typeArtigo de periódicopt_BR
dc.identifier.nrb000990792pt_BR
dc.type.originNacionalpt_BR


Thumbnail
   

Este item está licenciado na Creative Commons License

Mostrar registro simples