Mostrar registro simples

dc.contributor.authorNotti, Regina Kuhmmerpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorLazzaretti, Rosmeri Kuhmmerpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorGuterres, Cátia Moreirapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorRaimundo, Fabiana Viegaspt_BR
dc.contributor.authorLeite, Leni Everson Araújopt_BR
dc.contributor.authorDelabary, Tássia Scholantept_BR
dc.contributor.authorCaon, Suhélenpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorBastos, Gisele Alsina Naderpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorPolanczyk, Carisi Annept_BR
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-30T02:37:50Zpt_BR
dc.date.issued2016pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn1472-6963pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10183/158783pt_BR
dc.description.abstractBackground: Hypertension is a public health problem and a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease. The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of a multidisciplinary program based on group and individual care versus group-only care, to promote blood pressure control in hypertensive patients in primary health care. Methods: Randomized controlled clinical trial. The study was conducted within the primary health care, in two units of the Family Health Strategy, covering 11,000 individuals, in Porto Alegre, Brazil. Two hundred and 56 patients, older than 40 years old and with uncontrolled hypertension, systolic blood pressure (BP) ≥140 mmHg and/or diastolic BP ≥90 mmHg or ≥130 mmHg and/or diastolic BP ≥80 mmHg for individuals with diabetes. Eligible patients were randomly assigned to a health care program aiming for blood pressure control, with the multidisciplinary program group or with the multidisciplinary program plus personalized care group. Primary outcome measures were reduction in systolic BP from baseline to 6 months. Secondary measures included proportion of patients with systolic or diastolic BP controlled. Student t test, Pearson’s chi-squared test, Fisher’s exact test, Mann-Whitney U test, Wilcoxon signed-ranks test and generalized estimating equation (GEE) model were used in the analysis. Results: The baseline characteristics of participants were similar between groups. After 6 months of follow-up, systolic BP decreased markedly in both groups (Δ - 11.8 mmHg [SD, 20.2] in the multidisciplinary program group and Δ - 12.9 mmHg [SD, 19.2] in the personalized care group; p < 0.001). Similarly, we noted a significant change in diastolic BP over time in both groups (Δ - 8.1 mmHg [SD, 10.8] in the multidisciplinary program group and Δ - 7. 0 mmHg [SD, 11.5] in the personalized care group; p < 0.001). Conclusions: The study demonstrates similar effectiveness of a group intervention in comparison to a personalized education program in hypertension patients to achieve BP control. These findings indicate that the intervention can be for all hypertensive patients assisted in primary health care.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov IdentifierNCT01696318 (May 2013).en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfpt_BR
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofBMC health services research. London. Vol. 16, (Aug. 2016), 456, 13 p.pt_BR
dc.rightsOpen Accessen
dc.subjectHipertensãopt_BR
dc.subjectHypertensionen
dc.subjectPublic healthen
dc.subjectSaúde públicapt_BR
dc.subjectMultidisciplinary programen
dc.subjectPressão sanguíneapt_BR
dc.subjectSystolic blood pressureen
dc.subjectDiabetes mellituspt_BR
dc.subjectDiastolic blood pressureen
dc.subjectDiabetes Mellitusen
dc.titleEffectiveness of multidisciplinary intervention on blood pressure control in primary health care : a randomized clinical trialpt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de periódicopt_BR
dc.identifier.nrb001014193pt_BR
dc.type.originEstrangeiropt_BR


Thumbnail
   

Este item está licenciado na Creative Commons License

Mostrar registro simples