Mostrar registro simples

dc.contributor.authorPalominos, Penelope Estherpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorCampos, Ana Paula Beckhauser dept_BR
dc.contributor.authorRibeiro, Sandra Lúcia Euzébiopt_BR
dc.contributor.authorXavier, Ricardo Machadopt_BR
dc.contributor.authorXavier, Jady Wroblewskipt_BR
dc.contributor.authorOliveira, Felipe Borges dept_BR
dc.contributor.authorGuerra, Bruno Meirapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorSaldanha, Carla Forgiarinipt_BR
dc.contributor.authorMancuso, Aline Castello Brancopt_BR
dc.contributor.authorKohem, Charles Lubiancapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorGasparin, Andrese Alinept_BR
dc.contributor.authorBarros, Percival Degrava Sampaiopt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-23T02:30:22Zpt_BR
dc.date.issued2019pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn2523-3106pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10183/198363pt_BR
dc.description.abstractBackground: The presence of enthesitis is associated with higher disease activity, more disability and incapacity to work and a poorer quality of life in spondyloarthritis (SpA). There is currently no consensus on which clinical score should be used to assess enthesitis in SpA. The objective of the present work was to compare the correlation of three enthesitis indices (MASES, SPARCC and LEI) with measures of disease activity and function in a heterogeneous population of patients with axial and peripheral SpA. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in three Brazilian public university hospitals; patients fulfilling ASAS classification criteria for peripheral or axial SpA were recruited and measures of disease activity and function were collected and correlated to three enthesitis indices: MASES, SPARCC and LEI using Spearman’s Correlation index. ROC curves were used to determine if the the enthesitis indices were useful to discriminate patients with active disease from those with inactive disease. Results: Two hundred four patients were included, 71.1% (N = 145) fulfilled ASAS criteria for axial SpA and 28.9% (N = 59) for peripheral SpA. In axial SpA, MASES performed better than LEI (p = 0.018) and equal to SPARCC (p = 0.212) regarding correlation with disease activity (BASDAI) and function (BASFI). In peripheral SpA, only MASES had a weak but statistical significant correlation with DAS28-ESR (rs 0.310 p = 0.05) and MASES had better correlation with functional measures (HAQ) than SPARCC (p = 0.034). Conclusion: In this sample composed of SpA patients with high coexistence of axial and peripheral features, MASES showed statistical significant correlation with measures of disease activity and function in both axial and peripheral SpA.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfpt_BR
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofAdvances in rheumatology. São Paulo. vol. 59 (2019), 23, 9 p.pt_BR
dc.rightsOpen Accessen
dc.subjectEspondilartritept_BR
dc.subjectSpondyloarthritisen
dc.subjectEstudos transversaispt_BR
dc.subjectEnthesitisen
dc.subjectDisease activityen
dc.subjectÍndice de gravidade de doençapt_BR
dc.subjectFunctionen
dc.titleCorrelation of enthesitis indices with disease activity and function in axial and peripheral spondyloarthritis : a cross-sectional study comparing MASES, SPARCC and LEIpt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de periódicopt_BR
dc.identifier.nrb001098409pt_BR
dc.type.originNacionalpt_BR


Thumbnail
   

Este item está licenciado na Creative Commons License

Mostrar registro simples