Mostrar registro simples

dc.contributor.authorMiranda, Luiz Alberto Oliveira Ribeiro dept_BR
dc.date.accessioned2010-07-08T04:17:49Zpt_BR
dc.date.issued1991pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn0101-3157pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10183/24344pt_BR
dc.description.abstractThis article deals with Keynes' contribution on the recovering of the income and employment levels of growth. Contrary to the (neo)classical approach, Keynes argues that unemployment and the fall of nominal wages are not necessary to economic recovering. Even with fied nominal wages and increasing primary costs, economic growth on the short run, via effective demand expansion, allows firms to maximize their profits through the reduction of the real wage caused by the increase of general price level. On Keynes' view, the incompatibility between the sustaining of real wage level and the short run economic recovering arises from his critical reformulation of the principie of decreasing returns, as stated by the (neo)classical theory of production costs and supply prices. However, still in a Keynesian perspective, this incompatibility, if taken for granted, it is not a theoretical request for the analysis of economic growth on the long run.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfpt_BR
dc.language.isoporpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofRevista de economia política (São Paulo). Vol. 11, n. 4(44), (out/dez.1991), p. 50-69pt_BR
dc.rightsOpen Accessen
dc.subjectTeoria keynesianapt_BR
dc.subjectTeoria econômica neoclássicapt_BR
dc.subjectSaláriopt_BR
dc.subjectEmpregopt_BR
dc.titleOs postulados (neo)clássicos do emprego e a determinação dos salários em Keynespt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de periódicopt_BR
dc.identifier.nrb000256903pt_BR
dc.type.originNacionalpt_BR


Thumbnail
   

Este item está licenciado na Creative Commons License

Mostrar registro simples