Mostrar registro simples

dc.contributor.authorAguiar, Ludmilla Moura Souzapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorPereira, Maria João Veloso da Costa Ramospt_BR
dc.contributor.authorZortéa, Marlonpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorMachado, Ricardo Bomfimpt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-30T03:23:01Zpt_BR
dc.date.issued2020pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn1472-4642pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10183/267816pt_BR
dc.description.abstractAim: Field surveys are necessary to overcome Wallacean shortfalls. The task is even more important when human pressure on tropical—megadiverse—ecosystems is con sidered. However, due to financial constraints, spatial and temporal prioritization is required. Here, we used the concept of environmental complementarity to identify non-surveyed regions for bats that are environmentally different from other already surveyed regions. We highlighted regions in Brazil where field inventories could be conducted to locate new occurrences or even new bat species. Location: Brazil. Methods: We based our analysis on environmental characterization aiming to iden tify dissimilar regions to those already sampled for bats in Brazil. We used 21 envi ronmental variables to characterize 1,531 unique localities where bats occur. Then, we applied the parameters of a generalized linear model (GLM) to extrapolate the expected values of the environmental variables for the entire country. We compared the predicted values of localities with newly described bat species occurrence against the values for other bat species. Results: We found that sites from which recently discovered species were described are environmentally distinct from the sites where previously described species occur. Therefore, new occurrences and even new species could be found in regions that are environmentally dissimilar from those already surveyed. By crossing the model with a human footprint map, we defined temporal priorities for field inventories. Regions such as the Northern Cerrado and Western Caatinga should be surveyed first. Similar approaches could be undertaken for other biological groups or regions, allowing the identification of spatial congruence and the development of a comprehensive na tional programme for biological field inventories. Main conclusion: Newly described species occurred in environments dissimilar to those previously identified, showing that environmental complementarity analysis is a valid approach to define priority regions for new bat inventories.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfpt_BR
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofDiversity and distributions. Oxford. Vol. 27, no. 11 (Nov. 2020), p. 1510–1522pt_BR
dc.rightsOpen Accessen
dc.subjectChiropterapt_BR
dc.subjectBiodiversity surveysen
dc.subjectEnvironmental variablesen
dc.subjectDistribuição geográficapt_BR
dc.subjectSurvey gap analysisen
dc.subjectMorcegospt_BR
dc.subjectWallacean shortfallsen
dc.titleWhere are the bats? An environmental complementarity analysis in a megadiverse countrypt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de periódicopt_BR
dc.identifier.nrb001176224pt_BR
dc.type.originEstrangeiropt_BR


Thumbnail
   

Este item está licenciado na Creative Commons License

Mostrar registro simples