Mostrar registro simples

dc.contributor.authorScherer, Luciene Cardosopt_BR
dc.contributor.authorSperhacke, Rosa Deapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorJarczewski, Carla Adrianept_BR
dc.contributor.authorCafrune, Patricia Izquierdopt_BR
dc.contributor.authorMichelon, Candice Tosipt_BR
dc.contributor.authorRuppenthal, Rubia Denisept_BR
dc.contributor.authorRibeiro, Marta Osóriopt_BR
dc.contributor.authorRuffino-Netto, Antoniopt_BR
dc.contributor.authorRossetti, Maria Lucia Rosapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorKritski, Afrânio Lineupt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2011-08-09T06:01:06Zpt_BR
dc.date.issued2011pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn1471-2466pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10183/30950pt_BR
dc.description.abstractBackground: Direct smear examination with Ziehl-Neelsen (ZN) staining for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) is cheap and easy to use, but its low sensitivity is a major drawback, particularly in HIV seropositive patients. As such, new tools for laboratory diagnosis are urgently needed to improve the case detection rate, especially in regions with a high prevalence of TB and HIV. Objective: To evaluate the performance of two in house PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction): PCR dot-blot methodology (PCR dot-blot) and PCR agarose gel electrophoresis (PCR-AG) for the diagnosis of Pulmonary Tuberculosis (PTB) in HIV seropositive and HIV seronegative patients. Methods: A prospective study was conducted (from May 2003 to May 2004) in a TB/HIV reference hospital. Sputum specimens from 277 PTB suspects were tested by Acid Fast Bacilli (AFB) smear, Culture and in house PCR assays (PCR dot-blot and PCR-AG) and their performances evaluated. Positive cultures combined with the definition of clinical pulmonary TB were employed as the gold standard. Results: The overall prevalence of PTB was 46% (128/277); in HIV+, prevalence was 54.0% (40/74). The sensitivity and specificity of PCR dot-blot were 74% (CI 95%; 66.1%-81.2%) and 85% (CI 95%; 78.8%-90.3%); and of PCR-AG were 43% (CI 95%; 34.5%-51.6%) and 76% (CI 95%; 69.2%-82.8%), respectively. For HIV seropositive and HIV seronegative samples, sensitivities of PCR dot-blot (72% vs 75%; p = 0.46) and PCR-AG (42% vs 43%; p = 0.54) were similar. Among HIV seronegative patients and PTB suspects, ROC analysis presented the following values for the AFB smear (0.837), Culture (0.926), PCR dot-blot (0.801) and PCR-AG (0.599). In HIV seropositive patients, these area values were (0.713), (0.900), (0.789) and (0.595), respectively. Conclusion: Results of this study demonstrate that the in house PCR dot blot may be an improvement for ruling out PTB diagnosis in PTB suspects assisted at hospitals with a high prevalence of TB/HIV.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfpt_BR
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofBMC Pulmonary medicine. London. Vol, 11, no. 15 (29 mar. 2011), 10 p.pt_BR
dc.rightsOpen Accessen
dc.subjectTuberculose pulmonarpt_BR
dc.subjectReação em cadeia da polimerasept_BR
dc.subjectHIVpt_BR
dc.titleComparison of two laboratory-developed PCR methods for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in Brazilian patients with and without HIV infectionpt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de periódicopt_BR
dc.identifier.nrb000782096pt_BR
dc.type.originEstrangeiropt_BR


Thumbnail
   

Este item está licenciado na Creative Commons License

Mostrar registro simples