Mostrar registro simples

dc.contributor.authorMossmann, Márciopt_BR
dc.contributor.authorWainstein, Marco Vugmanpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorGonçalves, Sandro Cadavalpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorWainstein, Rodrigo Vugmanpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorGravina, Gabriela Lealpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorSangalli, Marleipt_BR
dc.contributor.authorVeadrigo, Francinept_BR
dc.contributor.authorMatte, Roselenept_BR
dc.contributor.authorReich, Rejanept_BR
dc.contributor.authorCosta, Fernanda Guimarãespt_BR
dc.contributor.authorBertoluci, Marcello Casacciapt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-10T02:34:15Zpt_BR
dc.date.issued2015pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn1758-5996pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10183/196736pt_BR
dc.description.abstractInsulin resistance is a major component of metabolic syndrome, type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) and coronary artery disease (CAD). Although important in T2DM, its role as a predictor of CAD in non-diabetic patients is less studied. In the present study, we aimed to evaluate the association of HOMA-IR with significant CAD, determined by coronary angiography in non-obese, non-T2DM patients. We also evaluate the association between 3 oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) based insulin sensitivity indexes (Matsuda, STUMVOLL-ISI and OGIS) and CAD. We conducted a crosssectional study with 54 non-obese, non-diabetic individuals referred for coronary angiography due to suspected CAD. CAD was classified as the “anatomic burden score” corresponding to any stenosis equal or larger than 50 % in diameter on the coronary distribution. Patients without lesions were included in No-CAD group. Patients with at least 1 lesion were included in the CAD group. A 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) with measurements of plasma glucose and serum insulin at 0, 30, 60, 90 and 120 min was obtained to calculate insulin sensitivity parameters. HOMAIR results were ranked and patients were also categorized into insulin resistant (IR) or non-insulin resistant (NIR) if they were respectively above or below the 75th percentile (HOMA-IR > 4.21). The insulin sensitivity tests results were also divided into IR and NIR, respectively below and above each 25th percentile. Chi square was used to study association. Poisson Regression Model was used to compare prevalence ratios between categorized CAD and IR groups. Results: Fifty-four patients were included in the study. There were 26 patients (48 %) with significant CAD. The presence of clinically significant CAD was significant associated with HOMA-IR above p75 (Chi square 4.103, p = 0.0428) and 71 % of patients with HOMA-IR above p75 had significant CAD. Subjects with CAD had increased prevalence ratio of HOMA-IR above p75 compared to subjects without CAD (PR 1.78; 95 % CI 1.079–2.95; p = 0.024). Matsuda index, Stumvoll-ISI and OGIS index were not associated with significant CAD. We concluded that, in patients without diabetes or obesity, in whom a coronary angiography study is indicated, a single determination of HOMA-IR above 4.21 indicates increased risk for clinical significant coronary disease. The same association was not seen with insulin sensitivity indexes such as Matsuda, Stunvoll-ISI or OGIS. These findings support the need for further longitudinal research using HOMA-IR as a predictor of cardiovascular disease.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfpt_BR
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofDiabetology and Metabolic Syndrome. São Paulo. Vol. 7, no. 100 (Nov. 2015), 7 p.pt_BR
dc.rightsOpen Accessen
dc.subjectDiabetes mellitus tipo 2pt_BR
dc.subjectDoença da artéria coronarianapt_BR
dc.subjectResistência à insulinapt_BR
dc.titleHOMA-IR is associated with significant angiographic coronary artery disease in non-diabetic, non-obese individuals : a cross-sectional studypt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de periódicopt_BR
dc.identifier.nrb000989720pt_BR
dc.type.originNacionalpt_BR


Thumbnail
   

Este item está licenciado na Creative Commons License

Mostrar registro simples