Mostrar registro simples

dc.contributor.authorLima, Juliana Beust dept_BR
dc.contributor.authorSoares, Douglas dos Santospt_BR
dc.contributor.authorLacerda, Filipe Ferrari Ribeiro dept_BR
dc.contributor.authorCarvas Junior, Nelsonpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorCarvalho, Gabrielpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorLeitão, Santiago Alonso Tobarpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorGoldraich, Livia Adamspt_BR
dc.contributor.authorClausell, Nadine Oliveirapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorStein, Ricardopt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-05T04:29:23Zpt_BR
dc.date.issued2020pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn2044-6055pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10183/225121pt_BR
dc.description.abstractIntroduction Heart transplantation is the gold standard treatment for selected patients with end-stage heart failure. Although this procedure can improve quality and prolong life expectancy, several of these patients persist with decreased exercise tolerance. Evidence suggests that exercise training can bring multifactorial benefits to heart transplant (HTx) recipients. However, it is unclear that exercise modality should be preferred. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review and network meta-analysis is to compare the efficacy and safety of different training modalities in HTx recipients. Methods and analysis We will perform a comprehensive literature search in PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, The Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Scopus, SportDISCUS, Web of Science Core Collection and PEDro from inception until November 2020. Two registries (ClinicalTrials.gov and REBEC) will also be searched for potential results in unpublished studies. There will be no restriction on language, date of publication, publication status or sample size. We will include randomised controlled trials enrolling adult HTx recipients with the presence of at least one exercise training group, which might be compared with another training modality and/or a non-exercise control group for a minimum of 4 weeks of intervention. The primary outcomes will be peak oxygen consumption and occurrence of adverse events. As secondary outcomes, the interaction between pulmonary ventilation, pulmonary perfusion and cardiac output, oxygen uptake efficiency slope, heart rate response, oxygen pulse, peak blood pressure and peak subjective perception of effort. In addition, we will evaluate the 6min walking distance, health-related quality of life, endothelial function, muscle strength, body fat percentage and lean mass. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Cochrane RoB V.2.0 tool, and we plan to use the Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis tool to assess confidence in the results.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfpt_BR
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofBMJ Open. London. Vol. 10 (2020), e044975, 6 p.pt_BR
dc.rightsOpen Accessen
dc.subjectExercício físicopt_BR
dc.subjectTransplante de coraçãopt_BR
dc.subjectRevisão sistemáticapt_BR
dc.subjectMetanálisept_BR
dc.titleExercise training modalities for heart transplant recipients : a systematic review and network metaanalysis protocolpt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de periódicopt_BR
dc.identifier.nrb001128429pt_BR
dc.type.originEstrangeiropt_BR


Thumbnail
   

Este item está licenciado na Creative Commons License

Mostrar registro simples