Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorGirardi, Adriana Muradáspt_BR
dc.contributor.authorTurra, Eduardo Eggerspt_BR
dc.contributor.authorLoreto, Melina Silva dept_BR
dc.contributor.authorAlbuquerque, Régis Buenopt_BR
dc.contributor.authorGarcia, Tiago Severopt_BR
dc.contributor.authorRech, Tatiana Helenapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorGazzana, Marcelo Bassopt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-04T03:49:41Zpt_BR
dc.date.issued2022pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10183/259834pt_BR
dc.description.abstractBackground: Critically ill patients have a higher incidence of pulmonary embolism (PE) than non-critically ill patients, yet no diagnostic algorithm has been validated in this population, leading to the overuse of pulmonary artery computed tomographic angiogram (CTA). This study aimed to comparatively evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) combined with laboratory data versus CTA in predicting PE in critically ill patients. Methods: A prospective diagnostic accuracy study. Critically ill patients with suspected acute PE undergoing CTA were prospectively enrolled. Demographic and clinical data were collected from electronic medical records. Blood samples were collected, and the Wells and revised Geneva scores were calculated. Standardized multiorgan POCUS and CTA were performed. The discriminatory power of multiorgan POCUS combined with biochemical markers was tested using ROC curves, and multivariate analysis was performed. Results: A total of 88 patients were included, and 37 (42%) had PE. Multivariate analysis showed a relative risk (RR) of PE of 2.79 (95% CI, 1.61-4.84) for the presence of right ventricular (RV) dysfunction, of 2.54 (95% CI, 0.89-7.20) for D-dimer levels >1000 ng/mL, and of 1.69 (95% CI, 1.12-2.63) for the absence of an alternative diagnosis to PE on lung POCUS or chest radiograph. The combination with the highest diagnostic accuracy for PE included the following variables: 1- POCUS transthoracic echocardiography with evidence of RV dysfunction; 2- lung POCUS or chest radiograph without an alternative diagnosis to PE; and 3- plasma D-dimer levels >1000 ng/mL. Combining these three findings resulted in an area under the curve of 0.85 (95% CI, 0.77-0.94), with 50% sensitivity and 96% specificity. Conclusions: Multiorgan POCUS combined with laboratory data has acceptable diagnostic accuracy for PE compared with CTA. The combined use of these methods might reduce CTA overuse in critically ill patients.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfpt_BR
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofPloS one. San Francisco. Vol. 17, no. 10 (Oct. 2022), e0276202, 11 p.pt_BR
dc.rightsOpen Accessen
dc.subjectAngiografiapt_BR
dc.subjectBiomarcadorespt_BR
dc.subjectEstado terminalpt_BR
dc.subjectEmbolia pulmonarpt_BR
dc.subjectDisfunção ventricular direitapt_BR
dc.titleDiagnostic accuracy of multiorgan point-of-care ultrasound compared with pulmonary computed tomographic angiogram in critically ill patients with suspected pulmonary embolismpt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de periódicopt_BR
dc.identifier.nrb001168979pt_BR
dc.type.originEstrangeiropt_BR


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
   

Este ítem está licenciado en la Creative Commons License

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem