Mostrar registro simples

dc.contributor.authorNobre, Glauber Carvalhopt_BR
dc.contributor.authorRamalho, Maria Helena da Silvapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorRibas, Michele Caroline de Souzapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorValentini, Nadia Cristinapt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-09T03:34:14Zpt_BR
dc.date.issued2023pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn1661-7827pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10183/270697pt_BR
dc.description.abstractBackground: Developmental coordination disorder (DCD) is a chronic impairment that affects several domains that mark the developmental trajectory from childhood to adulthood. Aim: This study examined the differences in physical and psychosocial factors for children with DCD and typical development (TD) and the associations between these factors with gross motor coordination. (2) Methods: Children with DCD (n = 166; age: M = 8.74, SD = 2.0) and TD (n = 243; Age: M = 8.94; SD = 2.0) attending private and public schools were screened using the MABC-2. Children were then assessed using the Körperkoordination test für Kinder (gross coordination), the Perceived Efficacy and Goal Setting System (self-efficacy), horizontal jump (lower limb strength), and dynamometer (handgrip strength). A semi-structured interview was carried out to examine the oriented physical activity practice in the daily routine, the time spent in the activities, and the use of public spaces to practice non-oriented physical activities. (3) Results: Children with TD showed scores significantly higher than children with DCD in almost all factors with small to very large effect sizes; the exceptions were self-care and daily physical activity. The structural equation model showed that for children with DCD, the BMI explained negatively and significantly the motor coordination (b = −0.19, p = 0.019), whereas physical activity (b = 0.25, p < 0.001), lower limb strength (b = 0.38, p < 0.001), and perceived self-efficacy (b = 0.19, p = 0.004) explained it positively. For children with TD, the BMI explained negatively and significantly the motor coordination (b = −0.23, p = 0.002), whereas physical activity (b = 0.25, p < 0.001) and lower limb strength (b = 0.32, p < 0.001) explained it positively. (4) Conclusions: The authors extended previous research by providing evidence that factors affecting motor coordination vary across childhood for children with DCD and TD. Self-efficacy was relevant only in explaining motor coordination for children with DCD.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfpt_BR
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. Basel. Vol. 20, n.4, 2801 (Feb. 2023) p. [1-13]pt_BR
dc.rightsOpen Accessen
dc.subjectMotor coordinationen
dc.subjectCoordenação motorapt_BR
dc.subjectTranstornos das habilidades motoraspt_BR
dc.subjectSelf-efficacyen
dc.subjectBody mass indexen
dc.subjectUltrassonografiapt_BR
dc.subjectAtividade físicapt_BR
dc.subjectStrengthen
dc.subjectÍndice de massa corporalpt_BR
dc.subjectPhysical activityen
dc.subjectForçapt_BR
dc.titleMotor, physical, and psychosocial parameters of children with and without Developmental Coordination Disorder: a comparative and associative studypt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de periódicopt_BR
dc.identifier.nrb001187173pt_BR
dc.type.originEstrangeiropt_BR


Thumbnail
   

Este item está licenciado na Creative Commons License

Mostrar registro simples